I've added this and Retribution into a new "Games" part of the StarCraft universe footer, which (naturally) includes StarCraft, Brood War and Ghost. Regardless of whether they are part of the Blizzard footer, they are officially part of the StarCraft universe - as said, they are given official recognition in the Battlenet FAQ.
Perhaps some general guidelines? Are only in-game references to be considered? Oh, by the by, the Battle.Net FAQ mentioning the add-ons is here, btw. Stuff from the various novels of toilet quality is included, isn't it? Be that as it may, seeing as the Starcraft Universe is one giant convoluted mess of incoherent non sequiturs, I really do fail to see what is and what isn't considered "worthy of inclusion". Tirolion 19:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC) They are not created by Blizzard and thus should not be included in the footer, same with Hellfire which was an endorsed add-on but not created by Blizzard - Fogeltje 19:10, 20 February 2007 (UTC) It doesn't change the fact that both these second party products suck dog, though. The two others are, you guessed it, Retribution and Insurrection. The FAQ states that there are three official add-ons for StarCraft, of which Brood War is one. Both the Insurrection and the Retribution add-on campaigns are, in fact, mentioned in Blizzard's official Battle.Net FAQ for StarCraft. I am going to cut it from those things along with Retribution unless someone has a good reason they should stay. It's a third party lacklustre expansion, not unlike D!Zone and the like for Doom. I really don't think this belongs in the footer box at the bottom of other Blizzard game articles - it's not even found on Blizzard's page.Inclusion in Blizzard Entertainment footer 7 Fair use rationale for Image:Insurrection.jpeg.1 Inclusion in Blizzard Entertainment footer.
0 kommentar(er)
